imr90 cells (Tocris)
Structured Review
![( A ) Schematic of the screen. ( B ) Representative images for IL-6 and IL-8 immunofluorescence (IF) of <t>IMR90</t> ER:RAS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. Scale bars, 100 μm. ( C ) Percentage of IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for IL-6 expression beyond a predetermined threshold following transfection with the indicated siRNAs. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001; ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( D ) Results of the pooled siRNA screen for SASP superinducers. Normalized B -score values of IL-6 versus IL-8 for each replicate sample siRNA are shown. The dashed lines represent the thresholds (+2 SD of the mean of the negative non-targeting siRNA controls). Hits were selected if siRNA pools showed a normalized B -score value for both IL-6 and IL-8 beyond the specified threshold in both replicates. ( E ) Screen for IL-6 superinducers. Normalized score for the control siRNAs (left) and samples (right). Dotted line denotes threshold. **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( F ) Summary of the SASP superinducer siRNA screens. The Venn diagram of the secondary screen shows the distribution of 124 hits across the indicated SASP readouts. ( G ) Percentage of IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for the indicated SASP components 7 days after siRNA transfection. Two distinct siRNAs targeting FURIN are shown as well as the non-targeting control. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( H ) Representative IF images of the indicated SASP components following transfection of siRNAs targeting FURIN . Scale bar, 100 μm. The results of the primary SASP siRNA screen [shown in (D) and (E)] are presented in table S1. The results of the secondary SASP siRNA screen [summarized in (F)] are presented in table S2.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_4740/pmc11734740/pmc11734740__sciadv.adn2811-f1.jpg)
Imr90 Cells, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 50 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cells+with+etoposide/pmc11734740-277-3-11?v=Tocris
Average 94 stars, based on 50 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "SMARCA4 regulates the NK-mediated killing of senescent cells"
Article Title: SMARCA4 regulates the NK-mediated killing of senescent cells
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2811
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the screen. ( B ) Representative images for IL-6 and IL-8 immunofluorescence (IF) of IMR90 ER:RAS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. Scale bars, 100 μm. ( C ) Percentage of IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for IL-6 expression beyond a predetermined threshold following transfection with the indicated siRNAs. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001; ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( D ) Results of the pooled siRNA screen for SASP superinducers. Normalized B -score values of IL-6 versus IL-8 for each replicate sample siRNA are shown. The dashed lines represent the thresholds (+2 SD of the mean of the negative non-targeting siRNA controls). Hits were selected if siRNA pools showed a normalized B -score value for both IL-6 and IL-8 beyond the specified threshold in both replicates. ( E ) Screen for IL-6 superinducers. Normalized score for the control siRNAs (left) and samples (right). Dotted line denotes threshold. **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( F ) Summary of the SASP superinducer siRNA screens. The Venn diagram of the secondary screen shows the distribution of 124 hits across the indicated SASP readouts. ( G ) Percentage of IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for the indicated SASP components 7 days after siRNA transfection. Two distinct siRNAs targeting FURIN are shown as well as the non-targeting control. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( H ) Representative IF images of the indicated SASP components following transfection of siRNAs targeting FURIN . Scale bar, 100 μm. The results of the primary SASP siRNA screen [shown in (D) and (E)] are presented in table S1. The results of the secondary SASP siRNA screen [summarized in (F)] are presented in table S2.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Transfection, Expressing, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the coculture of IMR90 ER:RAS and NK92-MI (NK) cells. ( B ) Quantification and representative images of NK-mediated killing of IMR90 ER:RAS cells, measured as the percentage change in cell count after 48-hour coculture using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Control wells contained dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 4OHT-treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells only. Scale bar, 300 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 5). **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( C ) Schematic of the experiment testing the effect of indisulam on NK-mediated killing. ( D ) Quantification and representative images of NK coculture with control and senescent IMR90 ER:RAS cells [2:1 effector–to–target cell (E:T) ratio]. Scale bar, 300 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 4). ** P < 0.01; two-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( E ) Schematic of the siRNA screen to identify siRNAs potentiating NK-mediated killing of senescent cells. ( F ) Screen results showing normalized NPA scores for NK-mediated killing of senescent cells. The teal dotted line represents the cutoff (NPA ≥ 0.7). Hits were selected if at least two of the four siRNAs targeting a gene scored above the cutoff in at least three of the six replicates. siRNAs against SMARCA4 are highlighted. Screen results are presented in table S3. ( G ) Summary workflow of the screens for siRNAs potentiating NK-mediated killing of senescent cells. ( H ) Quantification of the percentage change in IMR90 ER:RAS cell counts in the indicated conditions. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( I ) Representative images of IMR90 ER:RAS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs and cocultured with NK cells (2:1 E:T ratio) for 48 hours. Scale bar, 300 μm.
Techniques Used: Cell Counting, Staining, Control, Transfection
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Quantification and images of IL-8 expression in control and senescent IMR90 ER:RAS cells at day 7. AU-15330 was added on day 4. Scale bars, 300 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). ( B ) Coculture of senescent AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells and NK cells at 2:1 E:T ratio. Cell numbers were measured using IncuCyte software and normalized to time 0. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). a.u., arbitrary units. ( C ) Quantification of percentage change in AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells cocultured with NK cells (2:1 E:T ratio). Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 5). ( D ) Representative images of (C). Scale bar, 300 μm. ( E ) NK-mediated killing of etoposide-induced senescent AU-15330–treated IMR90 cells were cocultured with NK cells (2:1 E:T ratio). Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 4). ( F ) NK-mediated killing of cisplatin-induced senescent AU-15330–treated OVCAR4 cells cocultured with NK cells at day 6. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). ( G ) NK-mediated killing of senescent AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells cocultured with cord blood (CB)– or peripheral blood (PB)–derived NK cells. Data represent means ± SD. ( H ) Coculture of senescent AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells and peripheral blood–derived NK cells. Data represent means ± SEM. Ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) was performed for (A), while two-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) was used in (B), (C), (E), (F), (G), and (H). n.s., not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Software, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Heatmap representing average (of n = 3 replicates) NK-mediated killing of senescent IMR90 ER:RAS cells transfected with indicated siRNAs. ( B ) Percentage change in cell numbers of senescent IMR90 ER:RAS cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs following coculture with NK cells at a 2:1 E:T ratio. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( C ) Representative images from (B). Scale bar, 300 μm. ( D ) Heatmap of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data showing a SWI/SNF signature. ( E ) IMR90 ER:RAS cells were treated with AU-15330 on day 4. Representative IF images at day 7. Scale bars, 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for SMARCA4 from (E). Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( G ) Model of OIS in the liver. ( H ) Representative IF images of SMARCA4 and NRAS in liver samples. ( I ) SMARCA4 fluorescence intensity in NRAS + cells and NRAS − cells (left). A representative experiment out of the six mice ( n = 1000 cells). Data represent means ± SD. **** P < 0.0001; unpaired t test. Percentage of SMARCA4-positive cells in NRAS + and NRAS − cells (right). Data represent means ± SD ( n = 6). *** P < 0.001; unpaired t test. ( J ) SMARCA4 IF staining and quantification in ID8 Trp53 −/− cells treated with cisplatin (1 μM) or DMSO for 6 days. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data represent means ± SD ( n = 3). **** P < 0.0001; unpaired t test. ( K ) Schematic of in vivo intraperitoneal injection of ID8 Trp53 −/− cells and cisplatin treatment. ( L ) SMARCA4 IF staining and quantification in omental tumors. Scale bars, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 8 mice per group). * P < 0.05; unpaired t test.
Techniques Used: Transfection, RNA Sequencing, Fluorescence, Staining, In Vivo, Injection
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) plot of the SASP signature in 4OHT-induced IMR90 ER:RAS cells. NES, normalized enrichment score. ( B ) Heatmap of RNA-seq data showing up-regulation of SASP marker expression in senescent IMR90 ER:RAS cells transfected with siRNAs targeting SMARCA4 . ( C to F ) Representative IF images (left) and quantification (right) of AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for cGAS (C), pSTING (D), pTBK1 (E), and pIRF3 (F) staining. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 4). ** P < 0.01 and **** P < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). ( G ) Quantification of the percentage of IL-6– and IL-8–positive 4OHT-induced IMR90 ER:RAS cells in the presence or absence of AU-15330 following treatment with the indicated inhibitors (inh.). Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test).
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Marker, Expressing, Transfection, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot showing fold change of repetitive element subfamilies in siSMARCA4 versus siNT IMR90 ER:RAS + 4OHT cells. The dashed line indicates P adj. < 0.05. ( B ) Volcano plot showing fold change of satellite element loci in siSMARCA4 versus siNT IMR90 ER:RAS + 4OHT cells. Blue dots indicate significantly different (DESeq2, P adj. < 0.05, fold change > 1.5). ( C ) IF images and quantification of AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells positive for ORF1. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 4). ( D ) Representative IF images of cytoplasmic dsDNA staining (left), quantification of dsDNA intensity (center), and percentage of dsDNA-positive IMR90 ER:RAS cells (right) treated with and without AU-15330 as indicated. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 5). ( E ) IF images of IL-6 (top)– or IL-8 (bottom)–positive IMR90 ER:RAS cells treated with AU-15330 and lamivudine (3TC) as indicated. Scale bars, 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of IL-6– or IL-8–positive cells from (E). Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 3). ( G ) Representative IF images (left), quantification of dsRNA intensity (center), and percentage of dsRNA-positive IMR90 ER:RAS cells (right) treated with and without AU-15330 as indicated. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 5). ( H ) Schematic of siRNA experiment in AU-15330–treated IMR90 ER:RAS cells. ( I ) Quantification of IL-6–positive IMR90 ER:RAS cells. Data represent means ± SEM ( n = 6). ( J ) Scheme showing SASP activation and the mechanism of NK cell recruitment following SMARCA4 inhibition in senescent cells. Ordinary one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) was used for (C), ordinary one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) for (D) and (G), two-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) for (F), and two-way ANOVA (Šídák’s multiple comparisons test) for (I). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Staining, Activation Assay, Inhibition



